Firstly this post is not an attempt to gain pity, just a record of my experiences!
I found out that no matter what I achieve professionally and academically in life, or how affluent I do or do not become, I am nothing more than a statistic. My personal feelings, aspirations and desires do not matter in the grand scheme of things. Those long term goals that any human being may have simply do not apply to me, or anyone it seems, that is in need of PA support.
Currently I lead a pretty active social life. I am no hedonistic rock and roll legend, but it isn't bad. I have friends and go out and about with them, go to the cinema and gigs, all the usual things a 24yr old does, and due to my disability causing me a few technical hitches along the way, I get to take a PA with me to sort out all the things I can't.
Sounds great doesn't it, with a little support from one person, I can lead a life that is as close to mainstream as possible, within the confines of a disability. That's how it has been for the last four years, and hopefully how it will stay... However after today's meeting, that might not be the case.
Today's meeting threw up some rather interesting, judging, questionable and concerning points. It seems that my quality of life is all down to the funding and eligibility criteria that are available at the current time! I'm going to start from the beginning so you can see the whole background, and judge for yourself whether you agree with me or disagree with me, as always your comments are welcome.
When I first moved to Coventry into my flat, I was, like all new home owners, skint! I decided rightly or wrongly that I was going to use some of my disability benefit to contribute towards the cos of living, until I found my feet so to speak. I did, and it was all working out well, I had some PAs which were funded by the local social services and Primary Care Trust (PCT). Life was peachy and it all worked, I was living the dream, and independent disabled person, living in their own place and in gainful employment.
Now this continued for a while, until I was strongly advised to apply for funding from the Independent Living Fund (ILF). This is a fund that can help out social services and PCTs with they costs of a care package (what they call your PAs).
Now the catch with ILF funding is that you have to make a contribution. They assessed this for me and at the time, as I mentioned earlier I was skint! Now I can see quite fairly, that the contribution is covered but the disability benefit, but this was contributing towards the cost of living, so I declined the offer, but was willing to re apply when I was earning enough to be able to contribute. I didn't see the point of contributing for support in a home that I cannot live in because I can't afford to live there! So as I said I declined the offer. Then time passed and back then was suddenly now.
Now is a different story. I am working full time and can afford the contribution that I would be required to make to the ILF. However there is a small problem (that I am waiting to hear the resolution of, but it doesn't look good) and that problem is something the ILF call the three month rule.
The three month rule is something that the ILF instigated, I assume, to stop authorities making claims just because their budgets are running a bit low. In a nutshell the three month rule is this. If an application is made by an authority to the ILF and it is turned down, or is refused by the client, or doesn't come into place for whatever reason, you have three months to re apply. After that three months the ILF is very unlikely to be willing to fund anything because it sees the fact that the social services department has paid for the last three months and says that this is a commitment that the Social Services department has made to the service user (me).
So as you can imagine with my application over a year and a half ago, the representative from the ILF said it was doubtful, and that they would have to check with their manager. If a contribution from the ILF doesn't materialise I am going to have problems!
I asked the killer question, what happens if the ILF funding doesn't come through? What happens to my current care package?
Let me tell you I wasn't too happy with the answer.
If the ILF funding isn't available, then my current care package will have to be reassessed against the new eligibility criteria. Currently, Coventry social services are only funding the "critical" and "substantial" needs. Neither of those categories include any type of social life.
As you can imagine this is not a prospect that fills me full of optimism and cheer.
If there is very little support available to me at the weekends then how do I maintain my current lifestyle. Through no fault of my own there is the potential of me being forced to stay in at the weekends because there could be a bedtime curfew. If you only get assessed as having a critical need that means you need to be helped into bed, that will have to be done before 10pm as that is the end of a "care" day.
I don't think this is going to work do you??
So that is the position I am in at the moment, waiting for a decision from the ILF and if that doesn't turn out in my favor, waiting for a reassessment of my requirements where I am going to have to fight tooth and nail to keep the current level of support that I have to enable me to maintain as near to normal lifestyle as I can...
Now you know where I am currently, I would like to tell you the other bit, which if you pardon the expression, was the real kick in the balls.
The irony of this whole situation is that currently the government has a drive to get all the disabled people it can, who are capable, back into work. This means that I am a "priority 1" when it comes to Monday to Friday funding. There is no end of support they will give me to enable me to stay in work. I am fully supported from the moment I get up to the moment I go to bed, and even overnight, Monday to Friday, because I am working.
However when it comes to the weekend, the part of the week all working people look forward to, I am left with potentially no more support than the basic necessary help. That means no matter how well I do professionally in life, the opportunity for me to have a normal healthy social life is snatched away...
The biggest thing bothering me about the whole situation is the blase attitude that people in authority have for disabled people. You must forget when you read this that I am a person, with dreams and aspirations. I am merely a statistic, a cost to the local economy, who is judged by eligibility criteria. It doesn't matter that we have feelings, or that we may want to do something with out lives. If the money isn't there we have to get used to the fact that we are expected to go to work, contribute financially to society, but not to contribute emotionally or socially.
To me it seems that the old adage is becoming more and more true...
"A disabled person should be seen and not heard"
or is that a child......
In certain eyes the same thing?
